Saturday, March 10, 2018

hungry...for samples

This render was about 4 hours with some restriction as to what was reflected by what...very important.

SSS and 2 levels of diffuse bouncing makes for a very slow render...6 hours to get to 5% completion !

Monday, September 11, 2017

some RFM (Renderman for Maya) exploration

This solar car was re-modeled from Nurbs with some conversion done by Rhino, but most from Maya, with some of the car body poly-modelled from scratch. Rendered in Renderman for Maya.

Thursday, June 16, 2016

More notes on software Testing

no pretty pictures in this post im still finishing my Degree in Computer Science.
This post is on Software Testing and is done to aid my exam revision
SW testing : Principles and Practice ,

some definitions/acronyms:


Software Development Life Cycle, eg waterfall, Spiral, prototype, RAD, V-Model, Modified V-Model, Agile/ XP.

Waterfall Model Phases:
  Requirements Analysis
  Hi level Design
  Lo level Design
  Dev / Coding

Chacteristics of the Waterfall Model
Distinct phases
each phase feeds into the next

Advantages of the Waterfall Model

Disadvantages of the Waterfall Model
Sequential, if errors are detected it can be hard to trace their point of origin
potentially large amount of re-work to be done if an error is found in a previous phase
testing is left to the end of the life cycle (not ideal) !

Phases of the V-Model
Overall Business Requirements Analysis
Software Requirements analysis
Hi level design
Lo level Design 

Characteristics of the V-Model
Overall business Req's
UA test design

SW Req's
Sys test design
Hi Level Design
Integration Test design----------
Lo level DesignComponent Test design
Dev / Coding  - Unit test Design

Unit testing
Integration testing
Component Testing 
System Testing
User Acceptance Testing  

The process flow is from top to bottom on the left and from bottom to top on the right like the OSI model, or like drawing a 'V' shape

The test design phase is brought over to the left hand side of the model
test design happens earlier and corresponds to the initial development phases of the model, and 
also the test phases of the model.

Planning as a phase (as present in the waterfall model) is omitted as all phases have a degree of planning in them

The V-Model recognizes that different types of testing can be incorporated into the SDLC

Advantages of the V-Model

the tests are designed early - the earlier defects are found the better / cheaper the SDLC
the developers are in a good position to design the tests since they're familiar with the code

Disadvantages of the V-Model

rather than a model tracking the SDLC overall, the modified VModel recognises that various modules and components can be developed at different schedules - they are not sequential like the waterfall Model - and allows the tracking of individual modules but assigning each one entry and exit criteria to mark the start and end of their own VModel progression.    

Extreme Programming / the Agile Model
12 characteristics

1. the customer / client is kept happy with early and frequent deliveries of product iterations
2. changes to requirements re welcomed even late in the life cycle
3. deliveries of updates are frequent
4. there is close daily cooperation between the developers and the client
5. the developers are motivated individuals who can be trusted
6. co-location - face to face communication is possible

7.  working software is the primary measure of progress
8. developers are able to maintain a constant pace
9. continuous attention to technical excellence and good design
10. simplicity
11. best architectures, emerging from self-organising teams
12. regular reflection on how to become more effective and adjust accordingly

Quality: is meeting the requirements of customers consistently and predictably - where customers need not be paying customers - they can be testers or developers depending on the perspective.

Quality Assurance is more of a process oriented paradigm executed during the SE development phases, and has a defect prevention through hi-quality processes philosophy.

Quality Control is more like a post process, it follows more of a defect detection and correction paradigm rather than prevention. Quality Control can be seen as a sub-process of Quality Assurance, and may have its own dedicated team in a SW-dev company.

Requirements Tracability Matrix
As part of Black Box Testing, the RTM (Requirements Tracebility Matrix) maps the requirements to testing tasks through the use of ID codes / numbers. Implicit requirements are mapped to explicit requirements.
Testing is basically a QA and QC process. The aim is to find as many defects as possible before the customer does. Rarely do we find all defects. 

Software needs to be testable.

Defects found sooner in the development cycle are cheaper to fix than those found later,
so the sooner defects are found the better.

Dijkstra's Doctrine:
Program testing can never prove the absence of defects...only their presence.

Principles of Testing
Sometimes, most times, you simply cannot test all possible inputs to your program , so you have to be smart about what you test, or what inputs you pass to your tests. Constructing tests for even simple programs is not trivial.

ie even for a program that accepts combinations of only 6 32-bit integers - you cannot test all possible combinations easily. (6 possible 32-bit ints = (2^32)^6....if each one takes only 1 ns to test, thats still in the billions of years ) your tests must be chosen intelligently with strategies like Equivalence Partitioning and BVA Boundary Value Analysis.

Tests can be prioritized with their ability to find defects, ie Boundary Tests are more likely to uncover defects than testing of random input data.

We don't want tests to be too easy - just like exams...easy exams are not so informative to Academic staff on the students performance.

If defects are not detected in the beginning, they can propagate through the dev process, just like bugs can become resistant to pesticides.

Never assume that the discovery of many defects means there must not be many defects remaining, probably there are many more remaining - as they tend to reside in clusters or convoys.....probably.

Even if lots of code defects are found and corrected - if the requirements have defects, the final product will simply be wrong....(see the Waterfall model)

Likewise if the design is wrong, this will propagate through to the customer as well, so the early stages have the highest consequence of getting it wrong. An error found in the requirements stage will be much cheaper (exponentially) than the cost of a defect found after the software had been deployed.

Costs go up.

Validation can be described as the process of evaluating a system or component  during or at the end of the development process, to determine if satisfies the SRS.

to do:


Verification vs Validation


Thursday, April 21, 2016

NaN's (not a number)

I first came across this term I stared blankly into the TD's face feeling lost ..."what's a nairn ? " - thinking of Garlic Nairn bread...

Recently they copped up again whilst I was testing my Bullet coin sim  - sometimes I would re-render a small window around them in the render view / IPR environment and they would dissappear - other times they would stick around.

So i dug up some info: (*to be completed soon.)

Follow by Email